Workspaces & Sections default view mode

Folder_contents should display 50 items by page by default.

there is a difference between folder_view and folder_contents : with folder view something is empty but showed though, it makes a blank room. Could you remove it completely if empty ? see screenshots

Default view for every object (Folder, product,whatever is viewed) should follow the same model : currently the view of a folder and the view of a url are different (here a screenshot from the view of an url). Here the layout to follow, thanks.

Could you resubmit the attachments, pls? I get "not found" when I click on them. But if I understood correctly, you suggest that the "view" action corresponding to "folder_view" should not be displayed when the object has no content. This seems more complicated then a simple interface problem, like putting a Condition on the "view" action in portal_types->type_name->action_view , so that if object is "empty" (whatever that means), the action should not be displayed. I also expect other comments on this.

in folder_view, After the sort is done, there's no way to get back to the ordered folder real order. Thus the ajax features are disabled

Could you resubmit the attachments, pls? I get "not found" when I click on them.

here you are

But if I understood correctly, you suggest that the "view" action corresponding to

"folder_view" should not be displayed when the object has no content. This seems more

complicated then a simple interface problem, like putting a Condition on the "view"

action in portal_types->type_name->action_view , so that if object is "empty"

(whatever that means), the action should not be displayed.

No I did not say anything like that. Let me summary :
* concerning the attachment "view layout to apply" : view of urls (for instance) and view of folder are different. The layout I gave you is for all views.
* concerning the attachment "folder_view / folder_contents" : what to modify in those views layouts to make them match previous attachment.
* concerning the showing of view/contents in actions : if only one is avaliable it should not appear in actions (but we talked about that on jabber so I guess that's not the point)

Regarding the introduction of byline between Title and Description... As I have also said in a comment to #1272 , it's easy to do this for folder_contents (move around code in a template), but it's not the same thing for the folder_view of a Section, for example. In the second place "Title" and "Description" are two widgets, as defined in the "common" layout, and to introduce byline between them would mean to create a special widget for it, as I see it. This is not as trivial as in the case of folder_contents, that's why I asked for someone more experienced to tell me what the correct approach would be in this case.

Yes content_byline should probably be a widget, appearing only in view mode.

What's the status on this ? I still see a default view that is not the right one in workspaces.

I've attached a snapshot of /workspaces, taken from a local instance (code updated from trunk). "Default view mode in Workspaces should be Folder_contents" - checked. You can also go to ZMI->portal_types>Workspaces->Aliases , (Default) is set to "folder_contents". "Initial view name" is also set to "folder_contents", in portal_types>Workspaces->Properties. "Sort by" and "Display" ("Affichage") selectors should be removed. - checked, as you can see from the screenshot "Default display should be "Table"." - checked. "View" should not be proposed" - checked Dragos is working on the byline widget. And it's also this to do, "Documents should be sorted by last published inverted" in "sections/view".

Sections view is updated to have the new byline. This also applies to some of the documents (all that have a Title). We have to decide what to do with the rest of the documents (those that don't have a Title, for instance: URL): where will be the byline situated?

I think URL NAME should be considered as title (with no link on it) and URL as content. So the layout for URL should be : icon + Url Name byline Description URL

The two view modes shouldn't appear as actions if only one is available. 

If we don't have any action for the View (because the folder_contents doesn't have the rights to be displayed, for instance), the only way to return to the document view would be to use the breadcrumbs. Are we sure we want that?

now that you say it, i'm not so sure... :-) Alright we keep it as it is, even if it still bothers me when anonymous (see screenshot attached) but I guess actions are usefull in specific products. Let's close this ticket if everything else is ok.

Last attachment doesn't work. Maybe the space in the name of the file is the problem... There is one more thing remaining before closing the ticket: the unwanted space in Sections view.

I have renamed+reattached the screeshot.

Finally fixed everything in: [32084], [32158], [32168], [32187], [32190], [32443], [32485], [32488], [32489], [32546], [32547], [32561], [32562], [32563], [32619]. Phew...

Cool! Thanks.